ali delavar; asyeh Ebrahimi; mehraneh soltani
Abstract
: The present study was conducted in order to perform the meta-analyticstudy of individual and family factors that were effectiveonattention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Method:For this purpose 25studieswere collected and after entering data into CMA-2 softwareand sensitivity analysis, one study which ...
Read More
: The present study was conducted in order to perform the meta-analyticstudy of individual and family factors that were effectiveonattention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Method:For this purpose 25studieswere collected and after entering data into CMA-2 softwareand sensitivity analysis, one study which was disharmonious with other studieswas removed and finally,24 studieswere analyzed. The average effect size(r) in theindividual factors was 0.22 and in thefamily factors it was 0.14. So, according toCohen's criteria, the effect size of individual factors and family factors werereported below the average.In investigating the separated effect size offactors, the variables ofacademic performance, identity crisis,intelligence, working memory, and behavioralmanagementofparents were higher than average. Due to the significance of Qstatistic based on heterogeneity in these studies, the variables of sex,population, measuring instruments, sampling method and agewere entered into the analysis as confounding variables. Results: Zdifferences test, in the studies related to the individual factors, showed thatthe effect size was significant for all intervening variables but in examining thefamily factors, this difference was seen in the variables of sex, population, measuring instruments and sampling method. Conclusion:Due to the obtained average effect size in the above variables, researchers andclinicians should consider the importance of these factors in the evaluationand treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Also, researchersshould notice the role of modulators that were listed above in their futurestudies